The Gap That Will NEVER Be Linked
Amoeba (a one-celled organism)
News stories periodically report some new fossil find that is loudly proclaimed as the discovery of another "missing link" in human evolution. Of course all that the evolutionists are really finding are some ape bones that they can then use in making up their evolutionary stories. One of the things that is interesting about these stories of "missing links" is the gap in the fossil record that the evolutionists never want to discuss. The gap that evolutionists canít even begin to explain is the unbridgeable gap between single-celled and multi-celled animals.
While evolutionists can invent clever sounding stories about human evolution, they canít explain the hundreds of "missing links" between single-celled and multi-celled creatures. In a single-celled creature, such as an amoebae or paramecium, all of its function occur within the single cell. In a multi-celled creature specific systems exist to perform each separate function. Multi-celled creatures, even the simplest such as worms or sponges, have a minimum of five separate systems; circulatory, nervous, digestive, reproductive and respiratory.
Unlike a single-celled animal, the cells in a multi-celled animal are designed to do a specific job and cannot be interchanged with other cells in the body. For example a blood cell canít digest and a nerve cell canít carry oxygen. What evolutionists cannot explain is how could a single-celled animal evolve into a multi-celled animal without leaving a trace. For nowhere in the fossil record or the living world is there a single example of a two-celled animal, not one. There are numerous examples of single-celled animals, both fossil and living. Innumerable examples of multi-cellular creatures, both living and fossil, but not one example of a two celled, three celled, four celled, animal, etc.
Can anyone seriously maintain that a single celled animal could have evolved into a multi-cellular creature in one enormous evolutionary jump? But without that having happened, the evolutionary story falls apart. No fossil evidence exists with which to manufacture even a plausibly sounding story of how this change was supposed to have happened. So true to their form, evolutionists simply ignore this fact. All that is left for the evolutionists is a blind leap of faith across this unbridgeable gap.
I read on a self described skeptics web site that evolutionists donít "believe" in evolution, they simply observe it, as they observe math or gravity. But it is gaps like the one between single celled to multi-celled animals that give the lie to this claim and show the blind faith nature of the religion of evolution. These so-called skeptics arenít really skeptics at all, for their demand for evidence completely evaporates when it comes to a critical examination of evolution.
But donít Creationists have the same faith problem? No we donít, because our faith isnít in blind chance, but is in a Creator who has both told us and given us the evidence of what He has done. We donít pretend that we can find out all the answers. We know that the Universe that God created is understandable, but that Godís miracles are not.