Creation Station
Geology
The Gap That Will NEVER Be Linked
Amoeba (a one-celled organism)
News stories periodically report some new fossil find that is loudly
proclaimed as the discovery of another "missing link" in human
evolution. Of course all that the evolutionists are really finding are
some ape bones that they can then use in making up their evolutionary
stories. One of the things that is interesting about these stories of
"missing links" is the gap in the fossil record that the evolutionists
never want to discuss. The gap that evolutionists can’t even begin to
explain is the unbridgeable gap between single-celled and multi-celled
animals.
While evolutionists can invent clever sounding stories about human
evolution, they can’t explain the hundreds of "missing links" between
single-celled and multi-celled creatures. In a single-celled creature,
such as an amoebae or paramecium, all of its function occur within the
single cell. In a multi-celled creature specific systems exist to
perform each separate function. Multi-celled creatures, even the
simplest such as worms or sponges, have a minimum of five separate
systems; circulatory, nervous, digestive, reproductive and respiratory.
Unlike a single-celled animal, the cells in a multi-celled animal are
designed to do a specific job and cannot be interchanged with other
cells in the body. For example a blood cell can’t digest and a nerve
cell can’t carry oxygen. What evolutionists cannot explain is how could
a single-celled animal evolve into a multi-celled animal without
leaving a trace. For nowhere in the fossil record or the living world
is there a single example of a two-celled animal, not one. There are
numerous examples of single-celled animals, both fossil and living.
Innumerable examples of multi-cellular creatures, both living and
fossil, but not one example of a two celled, three celled, four celled,
animal, etc.
Can anyone seriously maintain that a single celled animal could have
evolved into a multi-cellular creature in one enormous evolutionary
jump? But without that having happened, the evolutionary story falls
apart. No fossil evidence exists with which to manufacture even a
plausibly sounding story of how this change was supposed to have
happened. So true to their form, evolutionists simply ignore this fact.
All that is left for the evolutionists is a blind leap of faith across
this unbridgeable gap.
I read on a self described skeptics web site that evolutionists
don’t "believe" in evolution, they simply observe it, as they
observe math or gravity. But it is gaps like the one between single
celled to multi-celled animals that give the lie to
this claim and show the blind faith nature of the religion of
evolution. These so-called skeptics aren’t really
skeptics at all, for their demand for evidence
completely evaporates when it comes to a critical examination of
evolution.
But don’t Creationists have the same faith problem? No we
don’t, because our faith isn’t in blind chance, but
is in a Creator who has both told us and given us the evidence of what
He has done. We don’t pretend that we can find out all the answers. We
know that the Universe that God created is understandable, but that
God’s miracles are not.
